Got Celebrity Sheriffs?
Emanuel McCray
1736 State Street
San Diego, California 92101-2513
(619) 696-9838
ezasabc@justice.com
http://ezasabc.blogspot.com
August 8, 2006
To:
(1) Laura M. Laughlin, FBI Seattle, Special Agent in Charge;
Steven R. Fiddler, Assistant Special Agent in Charge
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
1110 Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101-2904, (206) 622-0460; fbise@leo.gov.
(2) U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
San Diego Division; 9797 Aero Dr. San Diego, California 92123, Phone (858)-565-1255; Fax (858)-499-7991
RE: Complaint and Application for Temporary Restraining Order: U.S.A. ex rel Emanuel McCray v. A. Joe Hageman, et al., 06CV1537IEG filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on July 31, 2006 (Attached)
1. The attached documents are provided alleging criminal activities of Defendant Hageman’s alleged criminal confederation that have passed through at least six States—Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming and the World Wide Web (WWW) to attack the peace and dignity of indispensable plaintiffs Lynn Ann Hust and the People of the United States of America.
In Arizona:
plaintiff Hust’s Internet hosting company, Godaddy.com, was ordered to block her email to prevent her from getting her story out.
In Wyoming:
Lee Enterprises’ Casper Star-Tribune and other papers were told not to say a word because it required the media to tell her side of the story; a credit union was ordered to close her account for purposes of bouncing checks to support felony check fraud charges; the Laramie City Council removed a blogger from its community message board because the blogger was discussing Ms. Hust’s case.
In Colorado:
defendant Hageman found a check that was dead for five months for use in creating the first count of the criminal complaint.
In Washington and Oregon:
plaintiff Hust was arrested on what appears to be a phone call from Wyoming and has since been led to believe that a Governor’s warrant will be procured to back up false check charges should she refuse to come back to Wyoming and be murdered.
Posted on the criminal court docket for July 31, 2006, was what appeared to be an entry suggesting an arrest warrant from the Governor of Oregon was on file in Washington.
In San Diego:
Defendant Hageman sent an email to lead plaintiff in San Diego attempting to convince lead plaintiff that defendant Hageman could make the false check charges he created stick to plaintiff Hust.
On July 31, 2006, Washington State Superior Court Judge John Nichols threatened to allow the lead prosecutor to procure a warrant for this lead plaintiff’s arrest in San Diego in an effort to silence his voice regarding the alleged criminal wrongdoing Judge Nichols has made himself a party to.
Also on July 31, 2006, Judge John Nichols threatened to continue his pursuit of plaintiff Hust and deliver her to Wyoming, regardless if no warrant has been issued by a Governor for her arrest. Judge Nichols is therefore a nuisance and menace to the society and the lives of every American.
Not only is Ms. Hust a hostage to this cabal, but every American is an unconstitutional hostage, particularly Ms. Hust’s family, who has been threatened by Judge Nichols with arrest for harboring a fugitive.
2. The alleged wrongdoing of the named defendants rips through the fabric of numerous relations between families and their friends. For example, the mother of Ms. Hust’s Washington daughter-in-law performed vocals for the following recording artists:
Roy Orbison, Barry Manilow, Bob Seger, Van Morrison, Michael Martin Murphey, Steve Goodman, Joey Scarbury, Herb Pedersen, Jim Ringer, The Dillards, Dillard-Hartford-Dillard, Rodney Dillard, Glen Yarbrough and Blakey St. John of Santa Monica, California.
3. Of the named groups and individuals, Rodney Dillard’s album, “Will the Circle Be Unbroken, Vol III”, was nominated as “album of the year” during the 2003 IBMA Nominations. Rodney is still on tour.
4. Rodney Dillard’s son is a sheriff in Seattle, Washington; while Ms. Hust’s brother has been employed by the Clark County sheriff’s department for at least 20 years.
5. Rodney Dillard’s former wife, who is the mother of the Seattle sheriff, is also the mother of Ms. Hust’s daughter-in-law, Sara. Rodney Dillard’s former wife is also acquainted with the mother of Mike Diehl, the former partner of San Diego’s Cloud 9 Shuttle. The current CEO of Cloud 9 Shuttle is Mr. John Hawkins. This lead plaintiff currently provides limousine services for Cloud 9 Shuttle and Mr. Hawkins.
See also: California’s Public Utility Commission’s Transportation Carrier Information for Emanuel McCray and Cloud 9 Shuttle at the following URL:
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/tmis/det_PSG0017196.htm
6. When Sara was in the 3rd grade, this lead plaintiff became her pen pal and father incognito—not out of intimate relations with Rodney Dillard’s former wife—but rather after Sara’s father deserted the family when Sara was three years old.
7. This lead plaintiff promised Sara that he would be there for her if she needed him. Sara is now 24 years old and married to Ms. Hust’s son, who developed a very bad rash after hearing that his mother, Ms. Hust, had been wrongfully arrested and without a valid warrant of any kind. In fact, the whole throat of Ms. Hust’s son, Jeremiah, broke out in lesions.
8. The alleged criminal cabal threatens to break this circle of friends and relations through the alleged illegal use and abuse of executive, judicial and legislative power, coupled with threats by a Judge to arrest all who attempt to thwart the judge’s alleged illegal acquisition of jurisdiction over the person and life of Ms. Hust.
9. This alleged criminal cabal operates clan-like in nature; implicating the following legal doctrines and Federal statutes:
abuse of process; malicious prosecution; conspiracy; Title 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2, 3, 4, 201, 241, 242, 371, 1001, 1028, 1341, 1343, 1344, 1951(b), 1952, 1961, 1962, 1964 and 2701 et seq. and Title 42 U.S.C.A. section 1981 et seq. The attached documents tell the rest.
10. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has both constitutional (Oath or Affirmation; Supremacy) and statutory jurisdiction to investigate.
Semper Fidelis,
Emanuel McCray
U.S. Relator & Lead Plaintiff
Cc: (1) San Diego Reader; (2) San Diego Magazine; (3) Clerk, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; (4) John Hawkins, CEO, Cloud 9 Shuttle
Emanuel McCray
1736 State Street
San Diego, California 92101-2513
(619) 696-9838
ezasabc@justice.com
http://ezasabc.blogspot.com
August 8, 2006
District Court Case #06CV1537IEG filed July 31, 2006
To: Clerk, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Subj: Civil Complaint Forwarded to FBI Criminal Division
RE: Complaint and Application for Temporary Restraining Order: U.S.A. ex rel Emanuel McCray v. A. Joe Hageman, et al., 06CV1537IEG filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on July 31, 2006
Please take notice and inform the judge assigned to the referenced case that the subject documents on file in your court has been forwarded to the FBI for investigation as appropriate. The letter is attached.
Semper Fidelis,
Emanuel McCray
U.S. Relator & Lead Plaintiff
Attachment: (1) Letter to FBI office in Seattle and San Diego, dated August 8, 2006.
1736 State Street
San Diego, California 92101-2513
(619) 696-9838
ezasabc@justice.com
http://ezasabc.blogspot.com
August 8, 2006
To:
(1) Laura M. Laughlin, FBI Seattle, Special Agent in Charge;
Steven R. Fiddler, Assistant Special Agent in Charge
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
1110 Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101-2904, (206) 622-0460; fbise@leo.gov.
(2) U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
San Diego Division; 9797 Aero Dr. San Diego, California 92123, Phone (858)-565-1255; Fax (858)-499-7991
RE: Complaint and Application for Temporary Restraining Order: U.S.A. ex rel Emanuel McCray v. A. Joe Hageman, et al., 06CV1537IEG filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on July 31, 2006 (Attached)
1. The attached documents are provided alleging criminal activities of Defendant Hageman’s alleged criminal confederation that have passed through at least six States—Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming and the World Wide Web (WWW) to attack the peace and dignity of indispensable plaintiffs Lynn Ann Hust and the People of the United States of America.
In Arizona:
plaintiff Hust’s Internet hosting company, Godaddy.com, was ordered to block her email to prevent her from getting her story out.
In Wyoming:
Lee Enterprises’ Casper Star-Tribune and other papers were told not to say a word because it required the media to tell her side of the story; a credit union was ordered to close her account for purposes of bouncing checks to support felony check fraud charges; the Laramie City Council removed a blogger from its community message board because the blogger was discussing Ms. Hust’s case.
In Colorado:
defendant Hageman found a check that was dead for five months for use in creating the first count of the criminal complaint.
In Washington and Oregon:
plaintiff Hust was arrested on what appears to be a phone call from Wyoming and has since been led to believe that a Governor’s warrant will be procured to back up false check charges should she refuse to come back to Wyoming and be murdered.
Posted on the criminal court docket for July 31, 2006, was what appeared to be an entry suggesting an arrest warrant from the Governor of Oregon was on file in Washington.
In San Diego:
Defendant Hageman sent an email to lead plaintiff in San Diego attempting to convince lead plaintiff that defendant Hageman could make the false check charges he created stick to plaintiff Hust.
On July 31, 2006, Washington State Superior Court Judge John Nichols threatened to allow the lead prosecutor to procure a warrant for this lead plaintiff’s arrest in San Diego in an effort to silence his voice regarding the alleged criminal wrongdoing Judge Nichols has made himself a party to.
Also on July 31, 2006, Judge John Nichols threatened to continue his pursuit of plaintiff Hust and deliver her to Wyoming, regardless if no warrant has been issued by a Governor for her arrest. Judge Nichols is therefore a nuisance and menace to the society and the lives of every American.
Not only is Ms. Hust a hostage to this cabal, but every American is an unconstitutional hostage, particularly Ms. Hust’s family, who has been threatened by Judge Nichols with arrest for harboring a fugitive.
2. The alleged wrongdoing of the named defendants rips through the fabric of numerous relations between families and their friends. For example, the mother of Ms. Hust’s Washington daughter-in-law performed vocals for the following recording artists:
Roy Orbison, Barry Manilow, Bob Seger, Van Morrison, Michael Martin Murphey, Steve Goodman, Joey Scarbury, Herb Pedersen, Jim Ringer, The Dillards, Dillard-Hartford-Dillard, Rodney Dillard, Glen Yarbrough and Blakey St. John of Santa Monica, California.
3. Of the named groups and individuals, Rodney Dillard’s album, “Will the Circle Be Unbroken, Vol III”, was nominated as “album of the year” during the 2003 IBMA Nominations. Rodney is still on tour.
4. Rodney Dillard’s son is a sheriff in Seattle, Washington; while Ms. Hust’s brother has been employed by the Clark County sheriff’s department for at least 20 years.
5. Rodney Dillard’s former wife, who is the mother of the Seattle sheriff, is also the mother of Ms. Hust’s daughter-in-law, Sara. Rodney Dillard’s former wife is also acquainted with the mother of Mike Diehl, the former partner of San Diego’s Cloud 9 Shuttle. The current CEO of Cloud 9 Shuttle is Mr. John Hawkins. This lead plaintiff currently provides limousine services for Cloud 9 Shuttle and Mr. Hawkins.
See also: California’s Public Utility Commission’s Transportation Carrier Information for Emanuel McCray and Cloud 9 Shuttle at the following URL:
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/tmis/det_PSG0017196.htm
6. When Sara was in the 3rd grade, this lead plaintiff became her pen pal and father incognito—not out of intimate relations with Rodney Dillard’s former wife—but rather after Sara’s father deserted the family when Sara was three years old.
7. This lead plaintiff promised Sara that he would be there for her if she needed him. Sara is now 24 years old and married to Ms. Hust’s son, who developed a very bad rash after hearing that his mother, Ms. Hust, had been wrongfully arrested and without a valid warrant of any kind. In fact, the whole throat of Ms. Hust’s son, Jeremiah, broke out in lesions.
8. The alleged criminal cabal threatens to break this circle of friends and relations through the alleged illegal use and abuse of executive, judicial and legislative power, coupled with threats by a Judge to arrest all who attempt to thwart the judge’s alleged illegal acquisition of jurisdiction over the person and life of Ms. Hust.
9. This alleged criminal cabal operates clan-like in nature; implicating the following legal doctrines and Federal statutes:
abuse of process; malicious prosecution; conspiracy; Title 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2, 3, 4, 201, 241, 242, 371, 1001, 1028, 1341, 1343, 1344, 1951(b), 1952, 1961, 1962, 1964 and 2701 et seq. and Title 42 U.S.C.A. section 1981 et seq. The attached documents tell the rest.
10. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has both constitutional (Oath or Affirmation; Supremacy) and statutory jurisdiction to investigate.
Semper Fidelis,
Emanuel McCray
U.S. Relator & Lead Plaintiff
Cc: (1) San Diego Reader; (2) San Diego Magazine; (3) Clerk, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; (4) John Hawkins, CEO, Cloud 9 Shuttle
Emanuel McCray
1736 State Street
San Diego, California 92101-2513
(619) 696-9838
ezasabc@justice.com
http://ezasabc.blogspot.com
August 8, 2006
District Court Case #06CV1537IEG filed July 31, 2006
To: Clerk, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Subj: Civil Complaint Forwarded to FBI Criminal Division
RE: Complaint and Application for Temporary Restraining Order: U.S.A. ex rel Emanuel McCray v. A. Joe Hageman, et al., 06CV1537IEG filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on July 31, 2006
Please take notice and inform the judge assigned to the referenced case that the subject documents on file in your court has been forwarded to the FBI for investigation as appropriate. The letter is attached.
Semper Fidelis,
Emanuel McCray
U.S. Relator & Lead Plaintiff
Attachment: (1) Letter to FBI office in Seattle and San Diego, dated August 8, 2006.
posted by Emanuel at 4:35 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home